HOME | CASTLE | CHWR | DOVE | IBEW | OWMS | POEMS | ESOTERIC | SUMNER |
For over two centuries, Prince Hall Masons have been
labeled clandestine, insulted, ignored, denied entry to other lodges,
and virtually confined to a Masonic ghetto. Yet Prince Hall Masonry
survived, expanded, maintained the principles of Freemasonry,
and�whenever the opportunity arose�extended the hand of friendship
and forgiveness to its detractors. Often, that hand was rejected
outright or, if accepted, it was subsequently withdrawn as the result of
peer pressure or outright blackmail. But perseverance eventually
resulted in partial success.
Half of the Grand Lodges of Prince Hall Affiliation are now firmly
recognized by the �mainstream� Grand Lodge in the same geographical
area.[i] Some Prince Hall Grand Lodges have gone further, and obtained
recognition elsewhere in North America, or from the �home� or
�mother� Grand Lodges of England, Ireland and Scotland. A few have
extended the exchange of recognition further afield, eastwards to
Europe, south to Latin America and west to Japan, the Philippines,
Australia and New Zealand. But it is evident that most Prince Hall Grand
Lodges have little interest in wider recognition. Why should they bother
with overseas recognition? This essay will attempt to answer that
question, both generally, and then specifically in relation to Australia
and New Zealand.
The immediate advantages of recognition are most readily experienced at
home, in the same geographical area. Brethren of the Prince Hall and
�mainstream� Grand Lodges in the same State can visit each others�
lodges, observe the similarities and differences in their work, and
experience that warm fraternal feeling, attested to by many such
visitors. The Grand Lodges can join together in community work more
fully than before, exchange information, and�most important�the
Prince Hall brethren are no longer confined in a Masonic ghetto. They
can take their rightful place as true brothers, confident of the support
of the brethren of the other regular Grand Lodge, and they can share the
educational resources of that Grand Lodge, such as its libraries and
museums. Recognition, too, can be an aid in limiting the recruitment of
(in particular) African-Americans into bogus organizations.
If all of these advantages are gained by a �local� exchange of
recognition, what is the point of chasing recognition further afield?
Well, for a start, not all Prince Hall lodges and Grand Lodges are
located in a single State or Province in North America. Some have one or
more lodges in another US State or Canadian Province, many have lodges
overseas, and three are based entirely outside USA and Canada.[ii] The
brethren of these lodges and Grand Lodges need overseas recognition,
simply to obtain the advantages outlined above.
But, perhaps more importantly, �local� recognition does not bestow
true equality with the �local� mainstream brethren. Any US
�mainstream� Mason is free to visit almost any �mainstream�
lodge throughout the USA, Canada, and the rest of the world.
The only restriction imposed is that his Grand Lodge must be in amity
with the Grand Lodge where he wishes to visit. There are nearly 150
Grand Lodges in the �mainstream� group, most of which have a
recognition list of more than 100 Grand Lodges worldwide.
Most Prince Hall Masons do not yet enjoy that degree of freedom. They
can, of course, visit most (if not all) lodges in the Prince Hall
Affiliated group of Grand Lodges,[iii] and lodges of any
�mainstream� Grand Lodge with which they are in amity. In certain
instances, they may also be permitted (by special arrangement) to visit
lodges that have not been formally recognized. But to a very real
extent, doors are still closed to the traveling Prince Hall Mason, which
are open to his traveling �mainstream� counterpart. This freedom is
important, not only for the pleasure of visiting outside one�s
jurisdiction, but also for the fraternal assistance which may be given
in an emergency, and for the educational value. One of the things a
traveling Prince Hall Mason may learn from experience, not merely by
reading it or being told, is that most mainstream Grand Lodges outside
the United States have never considered that race, or the color of his
skin, is any indication of whether a man is a suitable candidate for
Masonry. He will learn, also, that there are many variations in the
work, and many different customs and usages, all designed to achieve the
same noble purpose. Surely, the broader a Mason�s perspective, the
more value he is to his brethren, his lodge and his Grand Lodge.
There remains a further reason why Prince Hall Grand Lodges should
vigorously pursue recognition overseas. In North America, nearly half
the Grand Lodges of Prince Hall Affiliation,[iv] and well over half of
all Prince Hall Masons, still lack �mainstream� recognition in their
own State or Province. They are still considered clandestine by many,
are still in the Masonic ghetto, and in most cases are likely to remain
so, unless peer pressure assists in influencing a change of heart. While
those North American �mainstream� Grand Lodges which have recognized
only their �local� Prince Hall counterparts are content with that
gesture, and while those Prince Hall Grand Lodges which have achieved
only �local� recognition press no further with the quest for
equality, they are failing to render fraternal assistance to our
segregated brethren below the Mason-Dixon Line, and in those two
enclaves further north.
The MW Prince Hall Grand Lodge of Connecticut, with a recognition list
of 30 or more �mainstream� Grand Lodges,[v] is arguably not only a
PHA Grand Lodge, but also itself a �mainstream� Grand Lodge, by
virtue of the number of �mainstream� Grand Lodges in amity with it.
Connecticut, then, is pointing the way. It is only when sufficient
Prince Hall Grand Lodges have really substantial recognition lists
within �mainstream� Masonry at home and abroad, that those Prince
Hall Grand Lodges may themselves be considered to be in the
�mainstream� group�an identifiable sub-group, retaining its own
identity within the larger group�and thus influence the whole group
from within. In this way, the stand-off group of non-recognitionists, a
mere 20 or so Grand Lodges, itself becomes the minority!
It might be thought that Australia and New Zealand are too
geographically remote and demographically small to be of interest or
importance to Prince Hall Freemasonry. Perhaps that judgment might have
been accurate half a century ago, but circumstances have changed
considerably in recent years. Many Americans come to the Antipodes, as
tourists, as sportsmen, and as serving members of the armed forces. In
all these categories, there are undoubtedly substantial numbers of
Prince Hall Masons. Most of the Australasian Grand Lodges are
willing�indeed, eager�to welcome Prince Hall visitors to their
lodges, even if there is no formal treaty of recognition. And most of
the Australasian Grand Lodges have taken steps to exchange recognition
with Prince Hall Grand Lodges�but in more than a few instances, their
approach has been ignored by the Prince Hall Grand Lodge. Nevertheless,
they are still interested in exchanging recognition.
The seven Grand Lodge of Australasia form a recognizable subset of the
�mainstream� group of Grand Lodges, with frequent conferences of
Grand Masters and Grand Secretaries, and a joint committee for fraternal
relations. The research lodges also confer under the
supra-jurisdictional Australian & New Zealand Masonic Research
Council (ANZMRC), whose president happens to be chairman of the
fraternal relations committee. The Council sponsors lecture tours
throughout Australia and New Zealand by overseas Masonic scholars, which
provide a cross-fertilization of ideas between Britain, North America,
Southern Africa and Australasia.
It can be seen, therefore, that an exchange of recognition with the
Grand Lodges of Australia and New Zealand is worthwhile, for the benefit
of individual traveling Prince Hall Masons, and for the Fraternity as a
whole. Some of the Australasian Grand Lodges may continue to actively
pursue recognition, while others�while still willing to resume
negotiations�may, because their earlier approaches were ignored, wait
to be approached by Prince Hall Grand Lodges. It would be a pity to
waste this residual good will, and fail to experience �how good and
how pleasant it is for brethren to dwell together in unity.�
I Specifically: Alta, AK, AZ, CA&HI, CO, CT, DC, IL, IN, IO, KS, MA,
MI, MN, NE, NV, NM, OH, OR, PA, RI, WA, WI.
II MW Prince Hall Grand Lodges of the Bahamas, the Caribbean, and
Liberia.
III The 45 listed in the 5th edition of the Prince Hall Masonic
Directory (including Liberia), plus the MW Prince Hall Grand Lodge of
Alberta (founded 1997), and soon the MW Prince Hall Grand Lodge of
Hawaii (to be consecrated in June 2001).
IV Namely: AL, AR, DE, FL, GA, KY, LA, MD, MS, MO, NJ, NY, NC, OK, Ont,
SC, TN, TX, VA, WV.
V Alberta, British Columbia, Connecticut, District of Columbia, England,
Germany, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Ireland, Maine, Manitoba,
Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nebraska, Netherlands, New Brunswick, New
Hampshire, New Zealand, Nova Scotia, Quebec, Rhode Island, Saskatchewan,
Scotland, South nd).
APPENDIX I:
WHAT IS REGULARITY AND RECOGNITION?
Every self-governing Grand Lodge has its own belief requirements and
code of conduct (�regularity�), and judges other Grand Lodges by its
own standards. If the two do not differ in any vital respect, they are
likely to each consider the other �regular�.
Regularity is a prime requirement for an exchange of �recognition�
between any two Grand Lodges, but it is not the only factor which may be
taken into account. Masonic recognition is rather like diplomatic
relations between countries. Diplomatic relations are usually only
established between countries that have commerce or some other contact
with each other; once established, they may be broken off if a quarrel
arises; and if there are two rival governments in a country, diplomatic
relations may be established with one and not the other. So, too, with
Masonic recognition.
Grand Lodges which recognize each other may form a group (formally or
informally, named or unnamed), and there may be some Grand Lodges within
that group which are recognized by most, but not by all, within the
group. One such group, probably the largest group in the world, does not
have a formal group name, but is often referred to as �mainstream�.
Its membership is drawn from every continent in the world, and includes
the United Grand Lodge of England, the Grand Lodges of Scotland,
Ireland, Israel, Greece, Turkey, Japan, Philippines, New Zealand, South
Africa, the United Grand Lodges of Germany, and the six Grand Lodges in
Australia, to name but a few. It also has recognizable sub-groups, often
formed on a geographical basis, such as the Grand Lodges of Brazil, and
Australasia; or because of a common ritual, such as the Nordic countries
which use the Swedish Rite; or of close historical ties, such as the
�home� or �mother� Grand Lodges of England, Ireland and
Scotland. One such sub-group is the 51 Grand Lodges of the United States
of America, whose membership historically (and regrettably) has been
mainly �Caucasian�. They are otherwise denominated �US mainstream
Grand Lodges�.
One of several groups of Grand Lodges that are not in the
�mainstream� group, are the Prince Hall Grand Lodges. This is a
medium-sized, cohesive and clearly identified group of Grand Lodges
which most �mainstream� Grand Lodges consider to be �regular�,
and with whom negotiations are (belatedly) taking place for mutual
recognition. It is a lengthy process, requiring reciprocal action
between each pair of Grand Lodges. The eventual result may be that the
PHA group becomes an identifiable sub-group of the �mainstream�
group of independent (autonomous) Grand Lodges.
APPENDIX II:
GRAND LODGES OF AUSTRALIA AND NEW ZEALAND
Australia and New Zealand are independent countries within the British
Commonwealth of Nations. They were settled from Britain early in the
19th century, and gained full independence early in the 20th century. In
each of these countries, Freemasonry was derived from English, Irish and
Scottish lodges, from 1820 onwards, and Masonic independence was gained
between 1884 and 1921.
There are six Grand Lodges in Australia, based largely on the political
boundaries of the six states which comprise the Commonwealth of
Australia. Three of the six extend their jurisdiction beyond state
boundaries, and one (Queensland) has lodges in the independent country
of Papua New Guinea. New Zealand has lodges on Pacific islands,
including one in Pago Pago, American Samoa. The three �home� Grand
Lodges of England, Ireland and Scotland still have lodges in Australia
and New Zealand, but are not permitted to charter new lodges there. Dual
and plural membership is quite common, and all jurisdictions are in
amity with each other. Brief notes on lodges of all these jurisdictions
are given below.
New Zealand
The Grand Lodge of New Zealand was formed in 1890. It has exchanged
recognition, or is in the process of doing so, with the Prince Hall
Grand Lodges of Massachusetts and Connecticut. There are also a
substantial number of English, Irish and Scottish lodges in New Zealand.
New South Wales
The United Grand Lodge of New South Wales and the Australian Capital
Territory, formed in 1888, is in amity with the Prince Hall Grand Lodges
of Colorado, Illinois and Indiana, and has sought to exchange
recognition with 12 others.
Queensland
The United Grand Lodge of Queensland, formed in 1921, also has lodges in
the independent country of Papua New Guinea. Queensland is in amity with
the Prince Hall Grand Lodges of Indiana, Oregon and Washington and has
sought to exchange recognition with all the others. There are two
English lodges in country towns in Queensland.
South Australia
The Grand Lodge of South Australia and the Northern Territory
Incorporated is the oldest Grand Lodge in Australasia, being formed in
1884. It permits selected lodges to work �foreign� rituals, namely
Schroeder (German), Goudieloch (Scottish), Carver (English), and
Italian. There is also a lodge with an Irish warrant. South Australia
has exchanged recognition with the Prince Hall Grand Lodges of
Massachusetts, Connecticut and Minnesota.
Tasmania
The Grand Lodge of Tasmania was formed in 1890, and is in amity with the
Prince Hall Grand Lodges of Massachusetts, Connecticut, California &
Hawaii, Washington and Wisconsin.
Victoria
The United Grand Lodge of Victoria was formed in 1889, and has exchanged
recognition with the Prince Hall Grand Lodges of Connecticut and
Indiana.
Western Australia
The Grand Lodge of Western Australia was formed in 1900. It has not
exchanged recognition with any Prince Hall Grand Lodge. There are 15
Scottish lodges in Western Australia, and one English lodge.