The
Royal Arch Myth
We Royal Arch Freemasons, in the American System,
call in which we dwell and do our business - A Tabernacle. The word Tabernacle
means a tent - coming from the Latin word Taberna which was
used by the Romans to denote a soldiers tent. It was constructed of
planks and covered with skins, and its’ outward appearance
presented the exact form of a Jewish Tabernacle, or Mishcan as they
called it. In the English system the Royal Arch Chapter represents
the ancient Sanhedrim where Zerrubabel, Hagai, and Joshua
administered the Law.
The Scriptures vividly enlightens us of the various forms or manners
in which Tabernacles were constructed and what they were used for
through the ages.
There was the Ante-Sinatic Tabernacle which was used as a
tent, perhaps from the beginning of Exodus, for the transaction of
business, and was situated some distance from the camp.
The next Tabernacle which evolved is one we all are familiar with.
The Sinaitic Tabernacle which was constructed by Aholiab and
Bezaleel under the immediate direction of Moses.
As the Anti-Sinatic Tabernacle was situated some distance from the
camp - The Sinatic Tabernacle of Moses was at the very center of the
camp with its’ door or entrance facing the East, and was placed
towards the Western part of an enclosed or outward court.
The Davidic Tabernacle in time took the place of that which
had been constructed by Moses. The old or Sinatic Tabernacle
accompanied the Israelites in all their wandering and was their only
Temple until David took possession of Jerusalem. From that time it
remained in Gibeon, and there is no account of its removal thence,
but when David removed the Ark to Jerusalem, he erected a Tabernacle
for its’ reception. Here the Priest performed their daily duties
and services until Solomon erected a Temple, and when the Ark was
deposited in the Holy of Hollies - the Davidic Tabernacle was put
away as a relic. Probably later burned during the destruction of the
Temple.
American Royal Arch Freemasonry myth tells us that, "They
traveled over rough and rugged roads - over rivers & mountains
until, at length, after a toilsome and dreary march of more than
four (4) months, they arrived at that city, where they erected a
tabernacle near the ruins of the old temple.
It says they "….erected a tabernacle," yet the
Scriptures informs us that there were no more than the three already
mentioned - The Ante-Sinatic, The Sinatic, and the Davidic.
The Royal Arch degree goes on to tell us that this tabernacle like
that built by Moses was an oblong, and situated due East and West.
Once again there is no historical evidence to prove that the
erection of such a temple ever took place.
We are left to believe that the Temple of Zerrubabel is nothing but
a myth with no historical foundation, but for the writers of the
American Royal Arch degree to go through so much trouble to
fabricate such an amazing story it must have been for the sole
purpose of developing and communicating symbolism. A symbolism which
is contained and understood by few and the privileged in the Royal
Arch Emblem and its’ Veils.
The belief that the tabernacle of Zerrubabel was an exact
representation of that erected by Moses, arose from the numerous
allusions to it in the writings of Rev. Dr. George Oliver and in the
American System by Thomas Smith Webb, and Jeremy L. Cross.
Mackey writes, "There is no harm in calling it a Tabernacle any
more than there is in calling it a Sanhedrim, provided we do not
fall into the error of supposing that either was actually its’
character."
Although as all myths that Freemasonry provided, this degree gives
us a fund of useful instruction.
written by Past High Priest David L. Gray in May of 1997
communicated in June of 1997
at Lincoln Chapter #2 RAM PHA
for Zerrubabel Day
|
|